An Analytical Report on the IMO Convention Process from Adoption to Enforcement

Introduction: The IMO as the Global Maritime Regulator

 The International Maritime Organization (IMO), a specialized agency of the United Nations, serves as the global standard-setting authority for the safety, security, and environmental performance of international shipping.¹ Its establishment was the culmination of a long history of international cooperation aimed at standardizing maritime practices, a necessity for an industry that is inherently global.³ Without a uniform regulatory framework, the shipping world would face a chaotic patchwork of conflicting national requirements, distorting commercial markets and compromising safety and environmental protection.⁴ The convention establishing the organization was adopted in 1948, and the IMO (then the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization, or IMCO) held its first meeting in 1959, marking a pivotal shift toward a permanent, structured body for maritime governance.²

The IMO’s foundational purpose, as articulated in its convention, is “to provide machinery for cooperation among Governments in the field of governmental regulation and practices relating to technical matters of all kinds affecting shipping engaged in international trade”.⁵ This mandate, initially focused on technical and safety matters, has formally expanded over the decades to institutionalize the protection of the marine environment as a core objective, largely in response to major pollution incidents like the

Torrey Canyon oil spill.⁶

This report analyzes the complete lifecycle of IMO conventions, from their conception to their enforcement on the high seas. Central to this analysis is a fundamental tension embedded within the IMO’s structure: while the organization is empowered to develop and adopt international legislation, it possesses no direct enforcement powers.⁸ The responsibility for implementing and enforcing these global rules falls entirely to the sovereign member states, which must translate international agreements into domestic law.⁹ This division of responsibility—between global adoption and national implementation—creates a structural paradox that is the primary source of the challenges, delays, and inconsistencies that define the journey of an IMO convention from a signed text into effective international law.

The Convention Lifecycle: From Diplomatic Conference to International Law

 The process by which an IMO convention evolves from an idea into binding international law is a multi-stage, legally meticulous journey. Each step serves a distinct purpose, reflecting a balance between achieving international consensus and respecting national sovereignty.

Stage 1: Proposal and Drafting

 The genesis of a new convention or an amendment to an existing one occurs within the IMO’s primary technical and legal bodies. These include the Assembly, the Council, the Maritime Safety Committee (MSC), the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC), the Legal Committee, and the Facilitation Committee.³ The impetus for a new instrument can be a singular, catastrophic event, such as the sinking of the

Titanic, which triggered the first International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), or the Torrey Canyon disaster, which spurred the development of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL).¹¹ Alternatively, the need can arise from extensive research and prolonged debate identifying an emerging threat, as was the case with the transfer of invasive aquatic species, which ultimately led to the Ballast Water Management (BWM) Convention.¹¹

Stage 2: Adoption

 Adoption is the formal procedure where the international community agrees upon the final text of a convention, typically at a diplomatic conference attended by delegations from UN member states.⁵ This step signifies that negotiations have concluded and a consensus on the wording of the instrument has been reached.³ For amendments to existing conventions, the process is often managed within the relevant committee (e.g., MSC or MEPC). The threshold for adopting an amendment is typically a two-thirds majority vote of the contracting governments present, provided that at least one-third of all contracting governments are in attendance for the vote.¹¹ It is crucial to note that adoption, in itself, does not impose any legal obligations on states; it merely finalizes the text of the agreement.³

Stage 3: Signature

 Following adoption, the convention is opened for signature for a designated period. A signature is a preliminary endorsement of the convention and signals a state’s intent to move forward in the process of becoming a party to the treaty.³ According to the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, which governs such international agreements, a state may sign a treaty “subject to ratification, acceptance or approval.” While this signature does not constitute final consent to be bound, it does create an obligation for the signatory state to refrain from acts that would undermine the treaty’s object and purpose until it clarifies its intention regarding ratification.³

Stage 4: Expression of Consent to be Bound

This is the most critical stage in the process, as it represents the sovereign act by which a state formally agrees to be legally bound by the terms of the convention. This step typically requires domestic legislative or parliamentary approval and is accomplished through one of the following formal acts [User Query]:

• Ratification: A two-step process where a state first signs the convention and later, after fulfilling its internal constitutional requirements, formally confirms its consent to be bound.³
• Accession: A one-step procedure where a state that did not sign the convention during the initial open period declares its consent to be bound. This has the same legal effect as ratification.³
• Acceptance or Approval: These terms are legally equivalent to ratification and accession but are used to accommodate the diverse procedural requirements of different states’ national laws.³

Stage 5: Deposit of Instrument

To formalize their consent, states must deposit a legal document, known as an “instrument of ratification” or “instrument of accession,” with the designated depositary [User Query]. For the vast majority of IMO conventions, the Secretary-General of the IMO serves in this capacity.¹² This depositary role is not merely administrative; it functions as the central nervous system of the entire treaty-making process. The Secretary-General is responsible for maintaining the official records, tracking the status of each convention, and formally notifying all member governments of every signature, ratification, accession, and declaration received.¹² This centralized function provides the transparency and official “scoreboard” necessary to determine precisely when the conditions for a convention’s entry into force have been met. Without this trusted, public ledger, which is accessible through publications like the IMO’s “Status of Conventions” document, the system of conditional entry into force would be unworkable.¹²

Stage 6: Fulfillment of Entry-into-Force Conditions

 Every IMO convention contains a specific “entry-into-force clause” that stipulates the precise conditions that must be satisfied before the treaty becomes active international law. This clause is a critical gatekeeping mechanism. For major technical conventions, this usually involves a dual requirement: ratification by a minimum number of states and ratification by states whose combined merchant fleets represent a minimum percentage of the world’s total gross tonnage.⁶ This design ensures that a convention has both broad political legitimacy and the backing of nations with significant maritime commercial power.

Stage 7: Entry into Force

 Once the thresholds defined in the entry-into-force clause are met, the convention officially “enters into force.” This typically occurs after a predetermined grace period, such as 12 months, from the date the conditions were fulfilled.¹⁷ This delay is intentional, providing states that have already ratified the convention with the necessary time to undertake final preparations, such as promulgating national legislation, training personnel, and establishing administrative procedures [User Query]. Upon entry into force, the convention becomes binding international law for all states that have formally expressed their consent to be bound.³

Anatomy of a Modern Convention: The Ballast Water Management (BWM) Convention Case Study

The journey of the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments (BWM Convention) provides a compelling, real-world illustration of the convention lifecycle. Its history demonstrates the protracted nature of international law-making and the complex interplay of scientific, economic, and political factors that shape a convention from its conception to its ongoing evolution.

The impetus for the BWM Convention emerged from a growing scientific understanding of a significant environmental threat: the transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens in ships’ ballast water.¹⁸ The issue was first formally raised at the IMO in 1988.¹⁷ Following years of study by the MEPC’s Ballast Water Working Group, established in 1994, it became evident that the unique nature of this threat required a dedicated, standalone convention rather than a simple amendment to the existing MARPOL framework.¹¹

This preparatory work culminated in the formal adoption of the BWM Convention on February 13, 2004.¹⁸ However, this was only the beginning of a long and arduous path to becoming law. The convention’s entry-into-force clause was deliberately stringent, designed to ensure the instrument had sufficient global backing to be effective. It required ratification by a minimum of

30 states, representing at least 35% of the world’s merchant shipping gross tonnage.¹¹

This dual-condition clause proved to be a powerful policy lever, but also a significant hurdle. While the threshold for the number of states was met within a few years, achieving the 35% tonnage requirement took over a decade. This long period of “ratification limbo” highlighted the immense influence of major flag states, whose decisions to ratify (or not) effectively controlled the convention’s fate.¹¹ The design of the clause forced a necessary balance: it prevented the convention from being activated by many small states with little shipping, ensuring that when it did enter force, it would have the backing of nations with substantial commercial fleets.

The critical moment came on September 8, 2016, when Finland’s accession finally tipped the tonnage over the 35% threshold, with 52 states representing 35.14% of the world fleet having ratified the convention.¹⁷ As stipulated in its text, the BWM Convention officially

entered into force one year later, on September 8, 2017.¹⁷

The convention’s implementation has been notably complex and phased:

• Regulation D-1 (Ballast Water Exchange Standard): An interim solution requiring ships to exchange their coastal ballast water with open-ocean water, which became the initial compliance requirement for existing ships.²⁴
• Regulation D-2 (Ballast Water Performance Standard): The ultimate requirement, mandating the installation and use of an approved Ballast Water Management System (BWMS) to treat ballast water and render organisms harmless. The compliance deadline for this standard was tied to each ship’s individual IOPP certificate renewal survey, creating a rolling implementation window that concludes for all applicable ships on September 8, 2024.¹⁷

Even after entering into force, the BWM Convention remains a dynamic instrument. Recognizing the technical challenges of implementation, the IMO established an “experience-building phase” (EBP) to systematically gather data and review the convention’s effectiveness, leading to further amendments.¹⁹ Key amendments have since been adopted to formalize the implementation schedule, make the BWMS Code mandatory, and enhance requirements for commissioning testing and record-keeping, with entry-into-force dates stretching into 2025 and beyond.¹⁹ The BWM Convention’s lifecycle, summarized in Table 1, thus exemplifies how modern IMO instruments are not static but are designed to be living documents that evolve with technology and operational experience.

Table 1: Chronological Timeline of the Ballast Water Management (BWM) Convention

Works cited

1. International Maritime Organization – Wikipedia, accessed June 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Maritime_Organization
2. Comprehensive Guide to IMO Conventions: Ensuring Maritime Safety, Security, and Environmental Protection, accessed June 16, 2025, https://maritimeducation.com/comprehensive-guide-to-imo-conventions-ensuring-maritime-safety-security-and-environmental-protection/
3. Conventions – International Maritime Organization, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/default.aspx
4. IMO CONVENTIONS: EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION | International …, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.ics-shipping.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/IMO-Conventions-Effective-Implementation-%E2%80%93-IMO-World-Maritime-Day-2014.pdf
5. IMO – National Maritime Center, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Portals/9/NMC/pdfs/stcw/imo_history_process_and_structure.pdf
6. Convention on the International Maritime Organization, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/Convention-on-the-International-Maritime-Organization.aspx
7. International Maritime Organization (IMO) – unjiu.org, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.unjiu.org/sites/www.unjiu.org/files/jiu_document_files/products/en/reports-notes/JIU%20Products/JIU_REP_1984_4_English.pdf
8. The IMO – for ‘safe, secure and efficient shipping on clean oceans’, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/577964/EPRS_BRI%282016%29577964_EN.pdf
9. Implementation, Control and Coordination – International Maritime Organization, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/msas/pages/implementationofimoinstruments.aspx
10. Conventions – International Maritime Organization, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/Default.aspx
11. Understanding IMO Conventions and resolutions – MySeaTime, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.myseatime.com/blog/detail/understanding-imo-conventions-resolutions-and-circulars
12. Status of IMO Treaties – INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION, accessed June 16, 2025, https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/About/Conventions/StatusOfConventions/Status%202024.pdf
13. (NEWS) IMO Director of Legal Affairs Lectures on Maritime Policy, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.wmu.se/news/imo-director-legal-affairs-maritime-policy
14. Convention on the International Maritime Organization. Geneva, 6 March 1948 – United Nations Treaty Collection, accessed June 16, 2025, https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XII-1&chapter=12&clang=_en
15. UNTC, accessed June 16, 2025, https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=080000028053b465
16. SOLAS Convention – Wikipedia, accessed June 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOLAS_Convention
17. Ballast Water Management Convention – Wikipedia, accessed June 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballast_Water_Management_Convention
18. International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments (BWM), accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/International-Convention-for-the-Control-and-Management-of-Ships%27-Ballast-Water-and-Sediments-(BWM).aspx
19. BWM Convention and Guidelines – International Maritime Organization, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/BWMConventionandGuidelines.aspx
20. Ballast water management – BWM Convention – Britannia P&I Club, accessed June 16, 2025, https://britanniapandi.com/2017/04/ballast-water-management/
21. IMO | Slow ratification of key maritime conventions threatens safety and security – Safe Seas, accessed June 16, 2025, https://safewaters.wordpress.com/2010/07/22/imo-slow-ratification-of-key-maritime-conventions-threatens-safety-and-security/
22. Update Ballast Water Management Convention – Lagersmit, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.lagersmit.com/blog/update-ballast-water-management-convention
23. Ballast Water Management Convention | Required documents merchant shipping, accessed June 16, 2025, https://english.ilent.nl/topics/required-documents/ballast-water-management-convention
24. What are D1 and D2 standards of ballast water management? – BIO-SEA, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.ballast-water-treatment.com/blog/what-are-d1-and-d2-standards-of-ballast-water-management/
25. Implementing the Ballast Water Management Convention, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/Implementing-the-BWM-Convention.aspx
26. Top 10 IMO Regulations You Must Know in 2025 – Maritime Education, accessed June 16, 2025, https://maritimeducation.com/top-10-imo-regulations-you-must-know-in-2025/
27. Ballast Water Management Convention | ClassNK – English, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.classnk.or.jp/hp/en/activities/statutory/ballastwater/index.html
28. Amendments to the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments, 2004, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.imca-int.com/news-events/imca-news/news/amendments-to-the-international-convention-for-the-control-and-management-of-ships-ballast-water-and-sediments-2004/